September 02, 2005
Opportunity Cost

My graduate school colleague Laura Taylor was cited in Robert Frank's NYT column yesterday:

Virtually all economists consider opportunity cost a central concept. Yet a recent study by Paul J. Ferraro and Laura O. Taylor of Georgia State University suggests that most professional economists may not really understand it. At the 2005 annual meetings of the American Economic Association, the researchers asked almost 200 professional economists to answer this question:

"You won a free ticket to see an Eric Clapton concert (which has no resale value). Bob Dylan is performing on the same night and is your next-best alternative activity. Tickets to see Dylan cost $40. On any given day, you would be willing to pay up to $50 to see Dylan. Assume there are no other costs of seeing either performer. Based on this information, what is the opportunity cost of seeing Eric Clapton? (a) $0, (b) $10, (c) $40, or (d) $50."

Stunningly, more than 3/4 of economists--not just any Joe Blow economists but the high powered types who attend the AEA meetings--got the question wrong. Here's the correct answer:

The opportunity cost of seeing Clapton is the total value of everything you must sacrifice to attend his concert - namely, the value to you of attending the Dylan concert. That value is $10 - the difference between the $50 that seeing his concert would be worth to you and the $40 you would have to pay for a ticket. So the unambiguously correct answer to the question is $10.

Posted by E. Frank Stephenson at 10:59 AM in Economics  ·  TrackBack (0)

Comments

I have received a couple of e-mail comments on this post. I will post them in two separate comments. I have read the comments, but I am only the messenger:

----------------------------------------------
As a pedagocal example, this is not a an advisable way to teach opportunity cost.

Opportunity cost is the highest valued alternative activity that one could have participated in, but chose not to.

In other words, the highest valued sacrifice involved in a given choice.


The problem with this example is that the example violates a basic premise. That is, it assumes that there is no cost for the Clapton ticket (i.e. it is "Free")


However, we teach our students that there is a cost to everything (there is no free lunch). That is the whole point to opportunity cost.

Consider an alternative way of interpreting this so as to get an answer of $50.


If someone gave me a free ticket, I might feel obligated to that person (i.e. this is a cost to me of getting a free ticket).

What value (or cost) do I place on the ticket that I am given? Well, I would look to the cost of a close substitute. The Dylan ticket has a price of $40. Hence, I might place a value of $40 on the Clapton ticket.

In this case the costs of both the Dylan and the Clapton will be $40.

The answer of $10 assumes that the cost of the Dylan ticket is $40 but the cost of the Clapton ticket is $0.

I still say there is no free lunch.

Given what I have just presented the opportunity cost would be $50 in the way that I have presented things.

Mark Wohar

Posted by: Craig at September 8, 2005 05:00 PM

"The problem with this example is that it violates a basic premise" ?!? And that's why you can't get the right answer to the question?

What if we asked physics professors a question like "Consider an object moving at 10 m/s across a frictionless surface ..." and every professor's gut reaction was to interrupt and say "But your question violates a basic premise of physics! There's no such thing as a frictionless surface!"? The first woodpecker that came along would destroy civilization.

Posted by: mobile at September 8, 2005 06:18 PM

adult video animalsex http://www.hemsida.net/akrep/wwwboard/282.html outdoor pissing http://www.hemsida.net/akrep/wwwboard/277.html human hermaphrodites pictures http://www.hemsida.net/akrep/wwwboard/279.html teen naughty amateurs http://www.hemsida.net/akrep/wwwboard/250.html free hardcore porn pics http://www.hemsida.net/akrep/wwwboard/332.html redhead teen nude http://www.hemsida.net/akrep/wwwboard/306.html rico's black hairy pussy http://www.hemsida.net/akrep/wwwboard/319.html asian transvestites http://www.hemsida.net/akrep/wwwboard/280.html black cumshots http://www.hemsida.net/akrep/wwwboard/309.html anime tits http://www.hemsida.net/akrep/wwwboard/272.html straight glory hole locations http://www.hemsida.net/akrep/wwwboard/328.html nude webcam http://www.hemsida.net/akrep/wwwboard/300.html hidden webcam http://www.hemsida.net/akrep/wwwboard/299.html sexy stocking http://www.hemsida.net/akrep/wwwboard/325.html naked blonde sluts http://www.hemsida.net/akrep/wwwboard/303.html threesome wife picture http://www.hemsida.net/akrep/wwwboard/294.html scat femdom http://www.hemsida.net/akrep/wwwboard/298.html hot older women http://www.hemsida.net/akrep/wwwboard/284.html free porn movie clips http://www.hemsida.net/akrep/wwwboard/273.html black bbw http://www.hemsida.net/akrep/wwwboard/310.html

Posted by: free live adult webcams at October 18, 2005 04:33 PM

The statesman who should attempt to direct private people in what manner they ought to employ their capitals would not only load himself with a most unnecessary attention, but assume an authority which could safely be trusted, not only to no single person, but to no council or senate whatever, and which would nowhere be so dangerous as in the hands of a man who had folly and presumption enough to fancy himself fit to exercise it. -Adam Smith

Our Bloggers
Joshua Hall
Robert Lawson
E. Frank Stephenson
Michael C. Munger
Lawrence H. White
Craig Depken
Tim Shaughnessy
Edward J. Lopez
Brad Smith
Mike DeBow
Wilson Mixon
Art Carden
Noel Campbell

Search

Archives
By Author:
Joshua Hall
Robert Lawson
E. Frank Stephenson
Michael C. Munger
Lawrence H. White
Edward Bierhanzl
Craig Depken
Ralph R. Frasca
Tim Shaughnessy
Edward J. Lopez
Brad Smith
Mike DeBow
Wilson Mixon
Art Carden
Noel Campbell

By Month:
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004

Powered by
Movable Type 2.661

Site design by
Sekimori

XML