December 06, 2009
So Many Bowl Games, So Few Bowl Teams

The NCAA now sanctions 34 post-season football Bowl Games in the Bowl (ie. Division I) Division. That's room for 68 teams. 119 teams play Division I ball. To be eligible for a bowl, however, you have to win at least 6 games, at least 5 of which must be against Division I competition. This year, there are 71 such teams.

So three eligible teams won't go to bowls this year. And there will be some pretty dull matchups. Go below the fold to explore the possibilties.

6-6 Notre Dame has already said it won't go to a bowl, so that leaves just two other eligible clubs that will not be playing anymore. My guess is that those two will be a pair of hyphonated name 6-6 clubs from the feared Sun Belt conference, Louisiana-Lafayette and Louisiana-Monroe. Give both schools credit: they were willing to take on the best this year. Lafayette lost at LSU and Nebraska by a combined 86-3. Monroe traveled to Texas and Kentucky, losing by a combined score of 95-33. Lafayette does have a 17-15 win over a mediocre Big 12 team, Kansas St., and beat Monroe head to head. Monroe's best win on the season was probably their 27-25 squeaker at 5-7 Florida Atlantic. Ouch.

So if those are the three who won't be going, who will we get to see?

How about 6-6 Wyoming out of the Mountain West, which didn't beat a team with a winning record. The one-time scourage of the MAC turned Conference USA also-ran, Marshall, should take a 6-6 record into a game, include a 52-21 loss to 4-8 UTEP. Marshall did at least beat a couple other bowl teams, though, 7-5 SMU and 7-5 Bowling Green. Speaking of Bowling Green, the MAC will send a bunch of teams to bowls. Conference Champ Central Michigan (11-2 with a road win at Michigan St.) is certainly credible, and I certainly wouldn't begrudge bids to 9-3 Temple, which has a road win at Navy on its non-conference schedule, or 9-4 Ohio U., which beat Temple handily. Bowling Green will go in at 7-5, with it's best win over Sun Belt champ and bowl-bound Troy (bonus points if you know what state Troy is in), but that's its only win over a .500 or better team, and they've got a pair of one point wins in there. But they played Missouri close, losing by a touchdown in Columbia, and all of their losses are to bowl bound teams. The weakest MAC entry will be Northern Illinois, another school which did not beat a team with a winning record all year. It's best win is a 28-21 road upset of 5-7 Purdue. They also stayed within a touchdown of Wisconsin up at Madison.

Some other 6-6 clubs you'll see in bowls: UCLA (one win over a .500 or better team, that being a 4 point blowout of 7-5 Tennessee); Minnesota, Iowa St., Texas A&M, Michigan St., and Florida St.

But those clubs are probably all better than some of the other 7-5 teams marching off to bowls, including Idaho (best win a 3 point victory at the afore-mentioned Northern Illinois early in the season, and losers of four of their last 5. The Vandals gave up 70 points to Nevada and 63 to Boise St.) Air Force is 7-5 with no embarrassing losses (TCU at home by 3; road losses to Utah, BYU, Navy and Minnesota) but no wins over teams with winning records. SMU has one victory over a team with a winning record, a 28-21 win over Conference USA Champ East Carolina. Southern Mississippi has a win over 8-4 Central Florida, and three losses to teams with losing records. There are a gaggle of 7-5 teams from the SEC moving on, all of them with some good wins and some bad losses.

Meanwhile, if Louisiana-Lafayette and Louisiana-Monroe are shut out, who will represent the Sun Belt in the bowls? Well, even the lowly Sun Belt can expect two bids, to conference champion Troy, which finished 9-3, but with just one victory over a winning team, a 31-7 home thrashing of conference rival Middle Tennessee St. Troy lost to Florida by 50 points, to Arkansas by 36, and even to Bowling Green by 17. The conference's other bowl bound member should be that Middle Tennessee St. squad, which also finished 9-3, losing to Clemson and Mississippi St. in addition to Troy. The Blue Raiders best wins? Well, they beat 2-10 Maryland by one point at Maryland; and they beat, of course, Louisiana-Lafayette and Louisiana-Monroe.

Posted by Brad Smith at 10:39 AM in Sports

Comments

Well if we're not going to have a playoff, this seems like the fine alternative - lots of exhibition games where fans get to see their teams one more time on national TV.

I don't see a problem with it.

Posted by: RB at December 6, 2009 02:03 PM

Yes, there are too many bowls. At least a half dozen too many.

Posted by: Cal at December 7, 2009 02:05 PM

The statesman who should attempt to direct private people in what manner they ought to employ their capitals would not only load himself with a most unnecessary attention, but assume an authority which could safely be trusted, not only to no single person, but to no council or senate whatever, and which would nowhere be so dangerous as in the hands of a man who had folly and presumption enough to fancy himself fit to exercise it. -Adam Smith

Our Bloggers
Joshua Hall
Robert Lawson
E. Frank Stephenson
Michael C. Munger
Lawrence H. White
Craig Depken
Tim Shaughnessy
Edward J. Lopez
Brad Smith
Mike DeBow
Wilson Mixon
Art Carden
Noel Campbell

Search

Archives
By Author:
Joshua Hall
Robert Lawson
E. Frank Stephenson
Michael C. Munger
Lawrence H. White
Edward Bierhanzl
Craig Depken
Ralph R. Frasca
Tim Shaughnessy
Edward J. Lopez
Brad Smith
Mike DeBow
Wilson Mixon
Art Carden
Noel Campbell

By Month:
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004

Powered by
Movable Type 2.661

Site design by
Sekimori

XML